Barriers to Trade Union Participation among Rural Migrant Workers in China: An Analysis of Labor Disputes, Employment Characteristics, and Socio-Demographic Factors

Luote Dai

Sch Digital Econ & Trade, Wenzhou Polytech, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, P.R. China.

Shengyu Gu *

School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou, Guangdong, 516007, P.R. China.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This study aims to understand the potential for migrant workers to join trade unions by analyzing labor disputes, employment characteristics, and socio-demographic factors. Utilizing data from a survey of 823 migrant workers conducted in Shanghai and nine other cities in China, this research examines both the associational (organizational membership) and behavioral (activity participation) aspects of trade union participation. The results indicate that rural migrant workers exhibit a low level of union participation, contrary to expectations based on their labor market position and the recruitment efforts by Chinese unions. Three primary barriers to union participation were identified: (1) migrant workers in state-owned firms are significantly more likely to participate in unions compared to those in private firms, where union presence is weaker; (2) occupational and employment status discrimination within workplaces hinders rural migrant workers from joining unions; and (3) trust in trade unions is relatively low among Chinese migrant workers, likely due to the close relationship between unions and the government, which may undermine union legitimacy and impede worker engagement. These findings highlight the systemic challenges that rural migrant workers face in engaging with trade unions in China.

Keywords: Trade unions, migrant workers, labor disputes, employment characteristics, socio-demographic factors


How to Cite

Dai, Luote, and Shengyu Gu. 2024. “Barriers to Trade Union Participation Among Rural Migrant Workers in China: An Analysis of Labor Disputes, Employment Characteristics, and Socio-Demographic Factors”. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics 21 (8):35-47. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2024/v21i8863.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.